AI Governance Compare

Data and infrastructure regulation compared — EU vs China

graded per item, sources below·checked 2026-10-06

One question: who owns, may use, and must protect the data and systems underneath AI? Short answer: the EU legislates for sharing and product security; China legislates for classification and control. Both push duties down the supply chain — from opposite directions.

Evidence grades (defined in 00-overview.md): A primary text, checked live; B other official source or a direct reading of the primary text; C our own comparison or inference, or not yet checked.

1. The table

Dimension EU China Grade
Non-personal and mixed data Data Governance Act (2022/868) + Data Act (2023/2854) Data Security Law (effective 2021-09-01) + Regulations on Network Data Security Management (effective 2025-01-01) A
Core idea sharing: re-use public-sector data, trusted intermediaries, data access rights control: classification and grading, important data, national security review C
Product security Cyber Resilience Act (2024/2847) — essential requirements + CE marking Cybersecurity Law (effective 2017-06-01; amended version in force 2026-01-01) — product and service compliance, mandatory standards A
Operator security NIS2 (2022/2555) — risk management, supply chain, incident reporting Cybersecurity Law + network data regulations — operator duties, incident response A
Key category triggers products with digital elements; essential and important entities critical information infrastructure (CII) and important data A
Data access rights yes — Data Act gives users of connected products access and third-party sharing rights no direct equivalent; the emphasis is on security and lawful processing A
Trusted intermediation yes — DGA registration regime for data intermediation services and data altruism no direct equivalent A
Applying from DGA 2023-09-24; Data Act 2025-09-12 ⚠; CRA reporting 2026-09-11, full 2027-12-11; NIS2 transposition 2024-10-17 ⚠ CSL 2017-06-01 (amended version 2026-01-01); DSL 2021-09-01; network data regulations 2025-01-01 B
Sanctions national penalties, market withdrawal, CE-marking consequences fines, suspension of business, licence revocation, personal liability A

2. Five observations

  1. Sharing versus control is the real dividing line. The EU's most distinctive instrument here is the Data Act's right to access and share data from connected products. China has no analogue — its instruments are about securing and classifying data, not expanding access to it. — C
  2. Same two questions, different splits. The EU separates product security (CRA) from operator security (NIS2). China handles both through the Cybersecurity Law plus the network data regulations, and lets CII status drive the extra duties. — C
  3. China's triggers are category-based; the EU's are product- and entity-based. "Is this important data?" and "is this CII?" have no EU equivalent; "is this a product with digital elements?" has no direct Chinese equivalent. — C
  4. Two compliance calendars. China's rules are already in force. The EU's heaviest security obligations arrive in 2026–2027, so a company operating in both runs a fast lane and a slow lane at once. — B
  5. Both reach down the supply chain. NIS2 does it contractually through supply-chain risk management; China does it through the CII chain and product-compliance duties. — C

3. What it means in practice

4. Limits and unverified ⚠

5. Official sources