Regulation on Ensuring Minors' Safe and Healthy Use of the Internet (consultation draft)
《国务院关于保障未成年人健康安全使用网络的规定(征求意见稿)》 — put out for public comment by the Cyberspace Administration of China on 18 September 2026; comments close 17 October 2026. Twenty-five articles. Not adopted: this is a consultation draft and is cited here as a proposal only. It is drafted for issue by the State Council as an administrative regulation, which would make it the first State Council-level instrument in this repository's China set.
publishedandeffectiveare empty by design: there is no instrument yet, and the draft's own Article 25 leaves the entry-into-force date blank (自2026年月日起施行). The English rendering here is ours; no official English text was found. ⚠
In one line
China is proposing to write minors' online protection into a State Council regulation with its own penalty ladder: services must not hand a minor stranger social networking, virtual relatives or virtual partners, addiction-inducing services or livestream hosting; an under-16 may reach social networking, games, video and AI services that may affect their cognition only inside a minor mode; and platforms must file that mode with the regulator and report on it every year.
What this document is — and what it is not
It is a consultation draft, not law. It carries no order number, no promulgating authority's seal and no entry-into-force date, and the CAC's notice asks the public for comments on it. Anything below may change or be dropped before adoption, and no obligation here is in force. Read it as evidence of the direction of Chinese regulation, and as the instrument that closes the reference the Anthropomorphic Interaction Services Measures already made to it. ⚠
Two structural points distinguish it from the other China cards. First, it is drafted as an administrative regulation (行政法规) to be issued by the State Council, not as a departmental measure — the instruments carded so far are CAC orders or joint departmental measures. Second, it is drafted to carry its own penalties rather than deferring entirely to other laws, in three bands keyed to which article was breached (Articles 18–20).
The drafting note published with it frames the exercise as 小快灵 — "small, quick, nimble" — legislation with Chinese characteristics for minors' online protection, and states that the draft runs to twenty-five articles.
Key provisions
| Art. | What it requires |
|---|---|
| 1 | Purpose and legal basis: the Protection of Minors Law, the Cybersecurity Law and the Personal Information Protection Law. |
| 2 | Scope: providing online services to minors inside China; also developing or manufacturing smart terminal products, and running an app distribution platform for smart-terminal users. |
| 3 | The best-interests-of-the-minor principle: assess the potential effect on minors, set the audience and the service mode accordingly, and provide minor mode per national rules and standards. The state encourages a domestic minors-only smart terminal industry. |
| 4 | Five prohibitions. No minor may be given: (i) stranger social networking — except to a minor aged 16 or over who lives mainly on their own labour income; (ii) virtual relatives, virtual partners or similar virtual-intimacy services; (iii) services that induce addiction or otherwise endanger a minor's wellbeing; (iv) livestream hosting to an under-16; (v) anything else barred by law or national rules. |
| 5 | Four service types an under-16 may be given only through minor mode: audio/video, livestreaming other than hosting, and online games; social networking — microblogs, forums, groups, friend circles, direct messages, comment threads; AI services that may affect a minor's cognition; and any other service with a material effect on minors. |
| 6 | Minor-identification duty, using legal identity documents, the state network-identity service, distributed digital identity, non-storage one-off face verification and behavioural recognition. SIM cards for minors lacking full civil capacity are issued through their legal guardian. |
| 7 | Content management; in minor mode no harmful content may be shown; where a minor is in an extreme situation such as self-harm or suicide, the provider must intervene and contact the guardian or emergency contact. |
| 8 | Compliance systems — algorithm review, science-and-technology ethics review, content management, network and data security — and staff matched to the service. No algorithmic model may be set up to induce a minor user's emotional dependency, addiction or excessive spending. |
| 9 | Once a user is verified or identified as a minor, the Article 4 services must be withheld and the Article 5 services switched into minor mode; an appeal channel must be provided, and measures lifted after verification. |
| 10 | Smart terminals: minor-mode linkage, one-tap switching, exit verification, anti-bypass, and time-of-day, duration, function and content management. App stores: listing review, age-appropriateness assessment, and limiting download or installation of apps outside their applicable age range. Both must follow Articles 4 and 5 as well. |
| 11 | Minor mode must meet national rules and standards and must detect harmful content, protect minors' personal information, prevent addiction and help guardians. The CAC with other departments builds the supporting technical standards. |
| 12 | Filing registry: terminal makers and service providers file their minor-mode configuration with the provincial CAC; providers with huge numbers of minor users or significant influence file with the national CAC through the province and report on the build and use of minor mode; the CAC conducts an annual verification. Also telecom type-approval testing of terminal minor mode, and the press-and-publication authority's games-addiction work. |
| 13–17 | Education departments and schools (13, 16), public security (14), mass organisations (15), guardians (17). |
| 18 | Penalties on the core duties (Articles 4, 5, 6(1), 7(3), 9(1), 11(1)): order to correct, warning, confiscation of illegal gains; where gains exceed RMB 1,000,000, a fine of 1 to 10 times the gains; otherwise RMB 100,000–1,000,000; responsible officers RMB 10,000–100,000. Refusal to correct or serious circumstances: suspension of the business, closure of the site or app, revocation of the licence or business licence. |
| 19 | Breach of the minor-mode switching duty (Article 9(2)): RMB 50,000–500,000. |
| 20 | Breach of the smart-terminal and app-store duties (Articles 10, 12(2)): RMB 100,000–1,000,000. |
| 21 | Otherwise the Protection of Minors Law, Cybersecurity Law, PIPL, the Regulations on the Protection of Minors in Cyberspace and the Telecom Regulations apply; civil, public-security and criminal liability are unaffected. |
| 24 | The CAC may adjust the Article 4 and Article 5 service lists over time; offering minor mode to a minor aged 16 or over is encouraged. |
| 25 | Entry into force is left blank — the draft reads 自2026年月日起施行, a 2026 date not yet filled in. |
Relationship to other instruments
- It generalises what the anthropomorphic-interaction measures already did for one sector. Article 14 of the Interim Measures for AI Anthropomorphic Interaction Services (in force 2026-07-15) bans virtual relatives and partners to minors for anthropomorphic services; Article 4(2) of this draft bans them for any network service offered to a minor, and Article 4(1) adds stranger social networking on top — the drafting note gives that pairing (陌生人网络社交服务、虚拟亲属和虚拟伴侣等虚拟亲密关系服务) as the substance of Article 4.
- Named as the legal basis or the fallback: Article 1 cites the Cybersecurity Law, the Personal Information Protection Law and the Protection of Minors Law; Article 21 routes anything not covered by Articles 18–20 to those laws plus the Regulations on the Protection of Minors in Cyberspace and the Telecom Regulations.
- The AI hook is Article 5(3): "AI services that may affect a minor's cognition" is written into the list of services an under-16 may use only through minor mode. No earlier Chinese instrument in this set names AI services as a category that triggers a mode switch; Order No. 21 regulated the AI service itself, this draft regulates minors' access to it.
- Against the EU: the EU does not have a minors' instrument of this kind either. The comparable duties are spread across three texts: DSA Article 28 (platforms accessible to minors must ensure a high level of privacy, safety and security, and must not show minors profiling-based advertising), AI Act Article 5(1)(b) (prohibited practice: exploiting vulnerabilities due to age with the objective or effect of materially distorting behaviour causing significant harm) and Article 50's disclosure duty for systems interacting with people (AI Act transparency duties). The EU rule that most nearly matches Article 4(2) of this draft is a prohibition aimed at the system's design; the Chinese draft instead withholds named service types from minors and builds a mode, a filing registry and a penalty ladder around the withholding. This comparison is this repository's reading. — C
- Enforcement design worth watching: the penalty for the core duties is keyed to illegal gains at the top band (1–10×), the same multiplier structure as the Cybersecurity Law's amended fines but on a revenue base rather than a fixed ceiling. Whether the gain base survives adoption is unresolved. ⚠
Why this matters for the comparison
Both systems now treat minors as a category that changes what a service may do, but they pull in different directions. The EU's DSA pulls the platform's design (no profiling-based ads to minors; a high level of privacy, safety and security) and the AI Act pulls prohibited exploitation of age-based vulnerability; both leave the service available. China's draft instead removes named service types from minors altogether — stranger social networking, virtual intimacy, livestream hosting under 16 — and gates a second list (social networking, games, video, cognitive-affecting AI) behind a mode that the provider must file with the regulator and report on annually. It is the mode-plus-registry pattern, not the risk-assessment pattern, applied to minors' access as such.
Official sources
- Consultation notice and full draft text, CAC (posted 2026-09-18, 来源:中国网信网; includes the drafting note 关于《国务院关于保障未成年人健康安全使用网络的规定(征求意见稿)》的说明): https://www.cac.gov.cn/2026-09/18/c_1791482017777471.htm
Source quotes
Every sentence below is copied from the official text and pinned to the snapshot in snapshots/ that this card was written against. node scripts/check-quotes.mjs re-checks them offline, so a quote that stops matching the source fails a check instead of quietly becoming the record. The prose above is a rendering; these are the anchors.
国家互联网信息办公室关于《国务院关于保障未成年人健康安全使用网络的规定(征求意见稿)》公开征求意见的通知— the consultation notice title (snapshot:snapshots/cn/minors-safe-network-use-draft.txt)国家互联网信息办公室2026年9月18日— the notice's issuing date (snapshot:snapshots/cn/minors-safe-network-use-draft.txt)意见反馈截止日期为2026年10月17日— the comment deadline (snapshot:snapshots/cn/minors-safe-network-use-draft.txt)《规定(征求意见稿)》共二十五条— the drafting note's article count (snapshot:snapshots/cn/minors-safe-network-use-draft.txt)第四条网络服务提供者不得向未成年人提供下列网络服务— Article 4 opens the prohibitions (snapshot:snapshots/cn/minors-safe-network-use-draft.txt)(一)陌生人网络社交服务,向十六周岁以上并以自己的劳动收入为主要生活来源的未成年人提供服务的除外— Article 4(1), stranger social networking and its 16-plus exception (snapshot:snapshots/cn/minors-safe-network-use-draft.txt)(二)虚拟亲属、虚拟伴侣等虚拟亲密关系服务— Article 4(2), the virtual-intimacy ban (snapshot:snapshots/cn/minors-safe-network-use-draft.txt)(四)向未满十六周岁的未成年人提供网络直播发布服务— Article 4(4), livestream hosting under 16 (snapshot:snapshots/cn/minors-safe-network-use-draft.txt)第五条网络服务提供者向未满十六周岁的未成年人提供下列网络服务的,应当通过未成年人模式提供— Article 5 opens the minor-mode list (snapshot:snapshots/cn/minors-safe-network-use-draft.txt)(三)可能影响未成年人认知的人工智能服务— Article 5(3), AI services affecting a minor's cognition (snapshot:snapshots/cn/minors-safe-network-use-draft.txt)第六条网络服务提供者应当具备未成年人用户识别能力,依法综合运用法定身份证件、国家网络身份认证公共服务、分布式数字身份认证公共服务、非存储式一次性人脸核验、行为特征识别等方式,提升未成年人用户识别精准度— Article 6, the identification duty (snapshot:snapshots/cn/minors-safe-network-use-draft.txt)发现未成年人用户存在自残自杀等威胁其生命健康的极端情境的,应当采取必要措施予以干预,并及时联络用户监护人或者紧急联系人— Article 7, the extreme-situation duty (snapshot:snapshots/cn/minors-safe-network-use-draft.txt)不得设置诱导未成年人用户情感依赖、沉迷以及过度消费等的算法模型— Article 8, the algorithmic-design ban (snapshot:snapshots/cn/minors-safe-network-use-draft.txt)第十条智能终端产品制造者应当为智能终端产品设置未成年人模式联动、一键切换、退出核验、防绕过以及使用时段、时长、功能和内容管理等功能— Article 10, smart terminals (snapshot:snapshots/cn/minors-safe-network-use-draft.txt)对于不符合应用程序适用年龄的,应当限制下载、安装该应用程序— Article 10, app stores (snapshot:snapshots/cn/minors-safe-network-use-draft.txt)未成年人用户数量巨大和对未成年人群体具有显著影响的网络平台服务提供者应当通过省级网信部门向国家网信部门备案,并提交未成年人模式建设和服务使用情况报告— Article 12, the filing and reporting duty (snapshot:snapshots/cn/minors-safe-network-use-draft.txt)第十八条违反本规定第四条、第五条、第六条第一款、第七条第三款、第九条第一款、第十一条第一款规定的— Article 18, which duties carry the top penalty band (snapshot:snapshots/cn/minors-safe-network-use-draft.txt)责令改正,给予警告,没收违法所得,违法所得100万元以上的,并处违法所得1倍以上10倍以下罚款,没有违法所得或者违法所得不足100万元的,并处10万元以上100万元以下罚款,对直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员处1万元以上10万元以下罚款— Article 18, the penalty bands (snapshot:snapshots/cn/minors-safe-network-use-draft.txt)处5万元以上50万元以下罚款— Article 19, the minor-mode switching penalty (snapshot:snapshots/cn/minors-safe-network-use-draft.txt)可以并处10万元以上100万元以下罚款— Article 20, the terminal and app-store penalty (snapshot:snapshots/cn/minors-safe-network-use-draft.txt)第二十五条本规定自2026年月日起施行— Article 25, entry into force left blank (snapshot:snapshots/cn/minors-safe-network-use-draft.txt)明确网络服务提供者不得向未成年人提供陌生人网络社交服务、虚拟亲属和虚拟伴侣等虚拟亲密关系服务等,并规定了相关例外情形— the drafting note on what Article 4 does (snapshot:snapshots/cn/minors-safe-network-use-draft.txt)
Unverified / TODO
- Whether the draft is adopted, and in what form — this card must be re-checked against the final text, and the entry-into-force date filled in, once the State Council issues it. Checked 12 October 2026: the consultation was still open (comments to 2026-10-17). ⚠
- The technical standards for minor mode that Article 11 promises (and the type-approval testing items for smart terminals under Article 12) are not published yet; when they are, they will decide what "AI services that may affect a minor's cognition" means in practice. ⚠ [gap:not_located]
- Whether the Regulations on the Protection of Minors in Cyberspace (未成年人网络保护条例) — cited by Articles 12 and 21 and already the source of Article 1 of the anthropomorphic-interaction measures — is carded in its own right. It is not, and this draft leans on it in two places. ⚠ [gap:not_located]
- The English rendering of every article and term in this card is this repository's own translation — no official English text was found. ⚠ [gap:no_official_translation]
- The EU side of the comparison above is a reading, not an anchored claim: DSA Article 28 and AI Act Article 5(1)(b) are cited by article number in the EU cards' prose, but neither passage is itself pinned to a snapshot in any
Source quotessection, socheck-quotes.mjsdoes not re-check them. ⚠ - Whether a Chinese version of this card is wanted: the instrument is Chinese, and this repository's China cards usually carry a
-zhtwin. Not written yet (a missing translation is not a defect here).